richardstacy.com Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the richardstacy.com

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host richardstacy.com. Currently, hosted in United States and its service provider is GoDaddy.com LLC .

the related websites

jll.co.uk maplestreet.co.uk amazon.co.uk huffingtonpost.co.uk finder.bupa.co.uk standbrook-guides.com beta.companieshouse.gov.uk 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

about me advanced social media training the book speaking contact me april 30, 2018 a politician who understands the world of the algorithm thanks to jeremy epstein (go-to for all things blockchain) for drawing my attention to this wired interview with emmanuel macron . here is a man who understands the world of the algorithm. there are three reasons you can tell this. first: he doesn’t talk about trying to lock-up access to data – he talks about making data open (with conditions attached – primarily transparency). second: from a regulatory perspective he focuses on the importance of transparency and shows he understands the dangers of a world where responsibility is delegated to algorithms. third: he talks about the need for social consent, and how lack thereof is both a danger to society but also to the legitimacy (and thus ability to operate) of the commercial operators in the space ( i was 7 years ahead of you here emmanuel ). as an example, he is opening access to public data on the condition that any algorithms that feed on this data are also made open. this is an issue that i belive could be absolutely critical. as i have said before, algorithms are the genes of a datafied society . in much the same way that some commercial organisations tried (and fortunately failed) to privatise pieces of our genetic code, there is a danger that our social algorithmic code could similarly be removed from the public realm. this isn’t to say that all algorithms should become public property but they should be open to public inspection. it is usage of algorithms that require regulatory focus, not usage of data. this is a man who understands the role of government in unlocking the opportunities of ai, but also recognises the problems government has a duty to manage. it is such a shame that there are so few others (especially in the uk where the government response is child-like, facile and utterly dissmisive of the idea that government has any role to play other than to let ‘the market’ run its course whilst making token gestures of ‘ getting tough ‘). share this: share linkedin twitter google email facebook print written by richardstacy no comments posted in algorithms , big data , blockchain tagged with algorithms , emmanuel macron , transparency , wired april 13, 2018 facebook, the stasi, kitkats, the nsa and a digital caste system: defining the privacy problem the gdpr (as played by king canute) and the rising tide of data (as played by the sea) mark zuckerberg’s appearance before congress is a good example of the extent to which politicians and regulators have no idea, to quote the donald, of “what on earth is going on”. it is not just them, this lack of understanding extends into the communities of thought and opinion framed by academia and journalism. this is a problem, because it means we have not yet identified the questions we need to be asking or the problems we need to be solving. if we think we are going to achieve anything by hauling mark zuckerberg over the coals, or telling facebook to “act on data privacy or face regulation” , we have another think coming. this is my attempt to provide that think. the google search and anonymity problem let’s start with google search. imagine you sit down at a computer in a public library (i.e. a computer that has no data history associated with you) and type a question into google. in this situation you are reasonably anonymous, especially if we imagine that the computer has a browser that isn’t tracking track search history. despite this anonymity, google can serve you up an answer that is incredibly specific to you and what it is you are looking for. google knows almost nothing about you, yet is able to infer a very great deal about you – at least in relation to the very specific task associated with finding an answer to your question. it can do this because it (or its algorithms) ‘knows’ a very great deal about everyone or everything in relation to this specific search term. so what? most people sort of know this is how google works and understand that google uses data derived from how we all use google, to make our individual experiences of google better. but hidden within this seemingly benign and beneficial use of data is the same algorithmic process that could drive cyber warfare or mass surveillance. it therefore has incredibly important implications for how we think about privacy and regulation, not least because we have to find a way to outlaw the things we don’t like, while still allowing the things that we do (like search). you could call this the google search problem or possibly the google anonymity problem, because it demonstrates that in the world of the algorthm, anonymity has very little meaning and provides very little defence. the stasi problem when you frame laws or regulations you need to start with defining what sort of problem you are trying to solve or avoid. to date the starting point for regulations on data and privacy (including the gdpr – the regulation to come) is what i call the stasi problem. the stasi was the east german security service and it was responsible for a mass surveillance operation that encouraged people to spy on each other and was thus able to amass detailed data files on a huge number of its citizens. the thinking behind this, and indeed the thinking applied to the usage of personal data everywhere in the age before big data, is that the only way to ‘know’ stuff about a person is to collect as much information about them as possible. the more information you have, the more complete the story and the better your understanding. at the heart of this approach is the concept that there exists in some form a data file on an individual which can be interrogated, read or owned. the ability of a state or an organisation to compile such data files was seen as a bad thing and our approach to data regulation and privacy has therefore been based on trying to stop this from happening. this is why we have focused on things like anonymity, in the belief that a personal data file without a name attached to it becomes largely useless in terms of its impact on the individual to whom the data relates. or we have established rights that allow us to see these data files, so that we can check that they don’t contain wrong information or give us the ability to edit, correct or withdraw information. alternatively, regulation has sought to establish rights for us to determine how our the data in the file data is used or for us to have some sort of ownership or control over that data, wherever they may be held. but think again about the google search example. our anonymity had no material bearing on what google was able to do. it was able to infer a very great deal about us – in relation to a specific task – without actually knowing anything about us. it did this because it knew a lot about everything, which it had gained from gathering a very small amount of data from a huge number of people (i.e. everyone who had previously entered that same search term). it was analysing data laterally, not vertically. this is what i call google anonymity, and it is a key part of google’s privacy defence when it comes to things such as gmail. if you have a gmail account, google ‘reads’ all your emails. if you have google keyboard on your mobile, google ‘knows’ everything that you enter into your mobile (including the passwords to your bank account) – but google will say that it doesn’t really know this because algorithmic reading and knowledge is a different sort of thing. we can all swim in a sea of google anonymity right up until the moment a data fisherman (such as a google search query) gets us on the hook. the reason this defence (sort of) stacks-up is that google can only really know your bank account password is if it analyses your data vertically. the personal data file is a vertical form of data analysis. it requires that you mine downwards and digest all the data to then derive any range of c

URL analysis for richardstacy.com

http://richardstacy.com/2014/04/
http://richardstacy.com/2015/12/10/google-the-united-states-of-data/
http://richardstacy.com/tag/carole-cadwalladr/
http://richardstacy.com/2016/06/
http://richardstacy.com/category/big-data/
http://richardstacy.com/2015/04/
http://richardstacy.com/tag/facebook/
http://richardstacy.com/tag/dasummit16/
http://richardstacy.com/2008/10/
http://richardstacy.com/2018/03/20/cambridge-analytica-facebook-data-illegal-matter/#comments
http://richardstacy.com/2014/11/
http://richardstacy.com/2009/03/
http://richardstacy.com/2017/08/04/time-talk-blockchain/?share=email
http://richardstacy.com/2013/03/
http://richardstacy.com/tag/content-marketing/
terriermandotcom.blogspot.co.uk
huffingtonpost.co.uk
bbc.co.uk
amazon.co.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: RICHARDSTACY.COM
Registry Domain ID: 1056166878_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com
Updated Date: 2018-06-30T18:18:03Z
Creation Date: 2007-06-29T16:18:28Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2019-06-29T16:18:28Z
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 146
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: [email protected]
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: 480-624-2505
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Name Server: NS03.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Name Server: NS04.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2018-08-14T14:35:13Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

  REGISTRAR GoDaddy.com, LLC

SERVERS

  SERVER com.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =richardstacy.com

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME richardstacy.com

  CHANGED 2018-06-30

  CREATED 2007-06-29

STATUS
clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited

NSERVER

  NS03.DOMAINCONTROL.COM 216.69.185.2

  NS04.DOMAINCONTROL.COM 173.201.69.2

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .